Showing posts with label Pytheas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pytheas. Show all posts

Thursday, January 26, 2012

The Great Circle

--The aerial northern “Great Circle” route in the headlines follows much the same transatlantic route used by early Keltic as well as Nordic seafarers.



Every Xmas, the press run some inane Santa tie-in story, such as NORAD is tracking his sleigh. This year it touched on a new “Santa’s shortcut” air route crossing the Arctic Circle allowed by changing airline regulations. This may or may not really be news, but the transatlantic ‘shortcut’ route cutting across the Arctic is certainly not a new idea. Just as today’s Santa is the development of an ancient idea [see books by Phyllis Siefker, Paul Frodsham, Tony Van Renterghem, etc], the ‘Santa’s shortcut’ route continues an ancient practice as far as transatlantic crossings go. Now you may wonder, looking at a standard map, why would an airliner from, say, New York to London be flying over Greenland in the first place? Why not just fly a straight E-W route? (In fact, NYC is southwest of London, the Titanic took this south-westerly route – though it didn’t save it from an iceberg.)



The answer lies in the deceptive standard map projection: plot the shortest course between, say, NYC and London on a globe with a piece of string, and you will find it skirts Iceland and traverses Greenland, crossing in and out of the Arctic Circle. Similarly, the route will show as a straight line on a ‘gnomonic’ map projection, a more accurate map projection, ironically said to be the world’s oldest, created in the 6C BC by the Greek scientist Thales.

But because this route appears as a curve on a flat Mercator-style map projection, it’s called a Great Circle Route. The airlines all follow Great Circle Routes and if you’ve never made the transatlantic crossing by air during daylight hours, get a window seat: take my word, I’ve made the trip several times, it’s well worth it for the view of the immensity of the North Atlantic (often littered with icebergs), Iceland and a whole slice of the Arctic Circle.

In fact, airlines have to fly a slight zigzag pattern over their GCR to maintain compass headings for set times, just as sailing vessels do, whether or not they are ‘tacking’ into head winds. And regulations requiring airliners to keep within x minutes of a place to land if need be, reflect the way sailors steer bearings that take them past a series of safe havens. In previous blog posts, we’ve discussed the importance of a type of ancient, carefully guarded, codex called a periplous, which was essentially a ship captain’s directional guide to a series of landfalls en route. And while it’s been assumed early seafarers didn’t have proper compasses, recently it’s been argued that they may have used the ‘sunstones’ referred to in the Norse sagas – crystal rocks which refract light differentially). However if you look at a map, the need to keep within a day’s sail (the Norse called this a doegr) of a harbour would take these vessels northward in any case, for the only landfalls for the North Atlantic crossing are up towards the Arctic Circle.



This fortunate coincidence, that the shortest route also has harbours more or less en route, allowed ancient Keltic and Nordic seafarers to cross the Atlantic. This so-called 'northern stepping-stone route’ arcs up NW from northern Britain or Scandinavia, past the Orkney Isles, passes within a day’s sail of the Shetlands, and then the Faeroes. There follows a dangerous open-water passage, NW over to Iceland, then the route heads NW again to make the shortest passage to the next landfall, SE Greenland, across the narrows of the Denmark Strait. There, midway once stood a lost land: a small group of habitable islets, now drowned by rising waters, called Gunnbjorn's Skerries. The sailing route then turned SW down Greenland’s east coast (helped by the current), continuing SW to landfalls on the North America continent, the closest of which is the tip of Newfoundland.



That this route was much used by early seafarers is not just a matter of map observation, for traces of Keltic and Nordic settlement have been found along these routes. The Nordics’ presence is well known, from the naming c980 AD of Greenland by Erik The Red (who should really have been called Erik The Ready Wit), through their use of Iceland as a base (attested in sagas) to the 1960s re-discovery of the ‘Viking’ settlement at L’Anse Aux Meadows on the northerly tip of Newfoundland, now a UNESCO World Heritage Site. That site, possibly settled by Erik’s son Leif Ericson, is usually identified as the land known in the Icelandic sagas as “Vinland the Good” (Vinland meaning Wine-Land) as it was then below the northerly limit for wild native grape-vines to grow (some identify Vinland as Nova Scotia). The search is still on for the sagas’ ‘Helluland’ (not an Erik The Red witticism, just Erik The Red’s son Leif Ericson’s ad hoc place-name, Old Norse for ‘Flat-Stone Land’ – possibly Baffin Island or northern Labrador) and Leif's ‘Markland’, meaning ‘Forest-Land’ which Leif also visited (somewhere farther south below the Arctic tundra/taiga treeline – possibly southern Labrador).

What is less well known, and is our concern here, is the presence of the earlier Keltic seafarers along this route. The orthodox view is that the Keltic presence which is found in Icelandic DNA etc is the result of Viking raiders taking slaves – mainly capturing Scots or Irish women to breed with. However the Nordic sagas themselves acknowledged the presence of earlier Keltic seafarers, referring to a land called Whitemansland (Hvítramannaland), or Irland-Mirka. This latter translates as Ireland-the-Great, usually rendered just as Greater Ireland. It is usually identified as Greenland, the idea being that there were Irish monastic settlements along the southerly coasts here. Its other name, Whitemansland, was taken from a native appellation for a land where (a native told the Norse) men in white robes processed carrying long poles with banners of white cloth and chanting loudly. They had "hair and skin as white as snow" and Whitemansland is sometimes translated Palefaces’ Land, paleface being a native term for the invading whites which survived in Hollywood-western Indian-speak, for what that’s worth. (Their white hair indicates older men, and another account says they wore a fringe, the shaved-pate effect which is the priestly tonsure in some orders.)

Early accounts exist in Latin as well as Icelandic Norse, and the terms used there are Hiberni (Hibernians, i.e. Irish), or Albani/albani, which can mean white men [when not capitalised] or men of Alban, a term for Britain [Greek Albion] and later in Gaelic sources for non-Romanised northern Britain. These are not just terms of origin, with Greater Ireland being translated as either Hibernia Major or Albania, suggesting more than just transient settlements. (The first Norse settlement in Iceland is dated to the reign of Pope Adrian, AD 772x795] while Greenland was first settled 986, by Eric The Red’s son Leif; the Norse abandoned their settlements in Greenland etc in the climate downturn of the 14th/15th Centuries.)




Here’s a quote from the first chapter of the Landnámabók, ‘The Book Of The Settlement Of Iceland’, which opens with how The Venerable Bede (historian and father of the English Church, fl. c.730) refers to old books that describe a land called Thule, ‘said to be six days' sailing north from Britain’, where ‘day came not in winter, nor night in summer’ (meaning it was above the Arctic Circle).

… before Iceland was peopled from Norway there were in it the men whom the Northmen called Papar; they were Christian men, and it is held that they must have come over sea from the west, for there were found left by them Irish books, bells, and croziers, and more things besides, from which it could be understood that they were Westmen [Irish]; these things were found east in Pap-isle and Papyle, and it is stated in English books that in those times voyages were made between these countries.

Do we have any Celtic codex sources on this presence? Sadly, there’s nothing that has survived quite like the Icelandic sagas, which are a distinct literary genre of historiography that developed as a written form after the Viking Age. De Mensura Orbis Terrae, a c825 geographical text by the Irish monk Dicuil (who may also be the anonymous Irish poet known as “Hibernicus exul”), describes the presence of a party of Irish monks who spent half a year on the farthest-north destination island of “Thule,” which is usually identified from details about the midnight sun as Iceland, but could be other sites to the east or west. With the Norse accounts that refer to these ‘papar,’ meaning fathers in the sense of priests, and place names like Pap-isle, are there not any more detailed matching Celtic church legends of far-flung anchorite colonies?



Legenda, meaning in Latin that which is to be read, were a then-popular ecclesiastical genre concerning saints’ lives - though unfortunately not reliable as historical accounts, the focus being on the fantastic and miraculous events the saint was involved with. Here, we do have a 8th C. composition, the Navigatio Sancti Brendani Abbatis, the Voyage Of Saint Brendan The Abbot, a strange legend concerning Irish seafaring monk St. Brendan The Navigator (one of the Twelve Apostles of Ireland), who sailed westward in a leather-and-woodframe currach c550 AD in search of the ‘Promised Land Of The Saints.’ A currach [spelling Anglicised as curragh; not to be confused with the small round Welsh coracle] is a Celtic seagoing-longboat design of unknown antiquity, but the associated boat-building skill is maintained in a few remote parts of the Gaeltacht [Gaelic-speaking area of western Ireland]. That it was possible to sail such a [twin-masted] currach across the north Atlantic, from Ireland to Newfoundland via Iceland, was demonstrated in 1976-7 by Tim Severin, in The Brendan Voyage, the title of a subsequent book and tv documentary. (Despite what you see in films, and the occasional reconstruction sailing voyage from 1893 onward, the Viking Norse didn’t use their dragon-prowed longships to cross the stormy seas, but a class of small merchant ship called knarr or knorr; I’ve read that the lifting action of Atlantic waves could break the back of a flat-keeled longship if one wave caught the bow and the other the stern.)



Even if St Brendan’s Navigatio was factually based, the actual route he and his fellow monks might have taken remains a matter of argument, for most of the legend’s strange encounters do not easily lend themselves to modern rationalising that would turn them into an account of an actual voyage or voyages past the Faeroes to Iceland and beyond (some argue all the way to Newfoundland). The Navigatio belongs to a then-popular type of marine wonder-tale genre known generically in Celtic as immram, and so incidents may have been copied from earlier now-lost instances. Tim Severin’s book, an international best seller, details his own route-rationale, which he explored with a 4,500-mile test voyage in his makeshift replica curragh; others have made their own research attempts on an armchair-travel basis using maps, ruler, compasses and textbooks. This has the advantage of tracing a set of different voyages which St Brendan may have made as the model for the tale as a composite adventure.
(The basic information is now all online, for anyone else who wants to have a look at it, starting with an English translation, here.) Of course, the Navigatio Sancti Brendani may be compiled from accounts by other papar, like Cormac, another Irish monk who is mentioned in Adomnán’s c700 Life Of St Columba as an intrepid sailor who went where no other had, over the uncrossable ocean to the north, but of whom we hear nothing more beyond Adomnan’s account.

More generally, regarding the problem of the lost discoveries and settlements by Keltic pioneers, one writer who has done ongoing field and literary research over several decades is veteran Canadian author Farley Mowat, who has written a series of books on this research area, culminating in his 1998 The Farfarers: Before The Norse (also issued in the UK as The Alban Quest: The Search For A Lost Tribe,1999). Mowat argues some sites classed as Norse really belonged to the Celtic seafaring settlers of North America he calls the Alban - largely the remnants of the Armorican tribes of Brittany enslaved by Caesar and later Picts from the Orkneys, driven ever westward by the advancing Norse. Mowat’s work is regarded by ‘serious’ historians as over-imaginative (he uses novelist’s techniques to add picturesque details), but academic research into such early transatlantic contact, which promotes the notion of multiculturalism, has of late acquired a certain respectability and impetus with a Worldwide Atlantic Conference in 2009, whose motto was, inevitably, 'Columbus was not first', and related pre-Columbian archaeo-finds such as this.

A less academically-respectable but separate longstanding line of enquiry by others has pursued the legend of a later (but still pre-Columbian) seafarer, the Welsh Prince Madoc discovering land to the west in 1170, and returning to Wales to escort a large fleet of colonists there. When the first American overland explorers crossed into the Ohio Valley, they discovered a tribe of native people called the Mandan, who they said bore odd similarities to the Welsh, in language as well boat-building style (round coracles on the Welsh pattern). This included the artist George Caitlin, who painted the coracle-like Mandan bull boat [pictured]. Sadly, the Mandans’ civilisation was almost wiped out by smallpox in the 1830s, right after Catlin visited.



But the controversy has continued ever since, the Welsh-Mandan claim being disputed as crypto-racism, or flagged up as English propaganda going back to the Tudor kings (Tudor was a Welsh name, Tewdr) to extend English geopolitical claims farther south, from the 16th century onwards. Hakluyt’s famous ‘Voyages’ even had Iceland seized for England by the fleet of mighty King Arthur – who even if real would scarcely have been English himself, but was adopted by the Welsh Tewdr/Tudor dynasty as a propaganda tool; Hakluyt was recycling and updating a part of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s 1135 (pre-Madoc) mythmaking Arthurian opus the Historia Regum Brittanorum, to promote English gains in the New World by Raleigh et al.) Although it got nowhere academically (though there is a U. Of Wales scientific research vessel called Prince Madoc) or politically (beyond local speculative commemorations), the Madoc story has lived on in literature.



For those interested in the Arthurian legend, this later northern-route tie-in to the legend has added a distinct subgenre of this subject area. This is based on the notion that the original legendary “isle of apples” Avalon, where Arthur was taken when mortally wounded and possibly also where the Holy Grail with its healing power was kept, was based on somewhere across the North Atlantic, some real island or peninsula on North America’s east coast, which a Celtic religious order used as the ultimate secret retreat. Like the Promised Land of the Saints, the Celtic Otherworld, after all, was somewhere to the West – perhaps it was a real place, a secret burial isle, perhaps a place of convalescence a wounded hero, if fortunate, might one day return from, or at least retire to, living out his days in peace?

Various writers have entertained the New World Avalon thesis, dating back at least to Arthurian-Glastonbury author Geoffrey Ashe in Land To The West, 1963, focusing on St Brendan’s voyage. Later entries, post the bestselling Holy Blood, Holy Grail, are more conspiracy-oriented, focusing on the Templars, Freemasons and related ‘hidden-history’ cover-ups: Michael Bradley in Holy Grail Across The Atlantic, 1988, Andrew Sinclair in The Sword And The Grail: The Story Of The Grail, The Templars And The True Discovery of America
, 1992, and Graham Phillips, in Merlin And The Discovery Of Avalon In the New World, 2005 [feature and cliff-hanging Ch. 1 online here and here). This is not entirely a new inspirational idea: there are Avalon place names on the map of eastern Canada in Newfoundland, notably the Avalon Peninsula, named after England’s official Province of Avalon colony, designed and given a Royal Charter in 1623 as a Glastonbury-style religious refuge (sadly, the long winters proved too much for the intended farming commune).




The ultimate goal in these early nor’westerly voyages of exploration was distant Thule, whose popular appellation in Latin (thanks to the poet Virgil) of Ultima Thule indicated it was believed to be the most northerly limit of land in the world. Today, we know this limit would be the north coast of Greenland, which is never approachable by sea except by modern icebreaker vessels. (The US built an airbase nearby which they called Thule.) But from descriptions of visits by various sailors (including Columbus) giving lengths of daylight, ancient Thule is usually taken to be Iceland, on the edge of the Arctic Circle – although again it could be lands east or west at a comparable latitude. (As Dava Sobel‘s 1996 bestseller Longitude details, establishing one’s E-W longitude remained a problem for mariners well into the 18C.)



The earliest visitor to write an account of visiting Thule for Greco-Roman readers was Pytheas c325 BC, who said he sailed there, near the edge of the congealed sea. Inevitably he was denounced as a liar, mainly by the Roman geographer Strabo (who never visited), and his book Peri Tou Okeanou (‘On The Ocean’) was lost to posterity (we have only passages quoted by others like Strabo). Pytheas was from Massilia, the modern Marseilles, then a Greek colony in the western Med offering trade access to mainland Gaul and points beyond, and this raises the prospect that Pytheas, who was a private citizen rather than an official, travelled with the help of local sailors, perhaps first from Gaul and then from Britain, who knew the north Atlantic trade routes.


In modern times, the surviving references to Pytheas’s lost book have allowed a re-appraisal by scholars such as Rhys Carpenter (Beyond The Pillars Of Hercules, 1966) and Prof Barry Cunliffe (The Extraordinary Voyage Of Pytheas The Greek, 2001). I have both these books and they definitely concur that Pytheas’s observations (which include latitude measurements using a gnomon or sundial-type calibrated measuring stick) are reasonable even if not that accurate. I suspect ‘Thule’ [pronounced Tooley] however was an obsolete pre-Keltic and then a poetic classical name meaning simply the far-away [cf Greek tele, ‘at a distance’], and was attached by different map-makers to different islands and peninsulas, from Norway to Shetland, the Faeroes, Iceland and Greenland. Thus, no set of coordinates given or geographic description matches up with the next. As the subarctic island-stepping-stone trade route opened up, the symbolic name Ultima Thule for the farthest land retreated like a mirage, reassigned to the next potential landfall on the next generation of maps being made back home.

It’s quite possible the notion of yet-another unknown island was kept alive for its confusion value - disinformation to maintain secrecy over trade routes. Just last year a rare giant map parchment scroll 6.75 m long, the Tabula Peutingeriana, was put on display as the only example of its type to survive. This was drawn in the 13C but based on 4C and older Roman sources giving official itinerary i.e. highway-stopover info, for the entire imperial road network, showing how it reached out to the ends of the known world. You can see from the detail I’ve reproduced below, taken from the map’s NW top-left corner there is a string of 3 small unnamed islands leading westward from “Jbernia Ins.” [Hibernia = Ireland] and ending with “Thyle Ins[ula]”. The stretched-planisphere scroll format means that neither directions or distances shown are to be taken seriously. The Romans were such hopeless mariners that it is more likely the Ultima-Thule stepping-stone route shown here derives from 2nd-hand info, perhaps from the work of Pytheas himself, for no Roman expedition seems to have followed up his circumnavigations (hence the arguments lasting for centuries between Roman writers over the accuracy of his observations).




Thus, we’ve come full circle, back to where transatlantic map-making explorations began. Nevertheless, I would argue there is a reasonable supposition that Celtic mariners knew the sea route from mainland Europe as far northwest as Shetland (at 600 N.) and probably Iceland (and the pack ice of the Frozen Sea beyond) as far back as c325 BC, and may well have crossed all the way to the New World in their currachs.

What is needed is archeo evidence regarding the traces of early settlement along the route indicated above, by Keltic monastic refugees, traders, fishermen and whalers etc. Author Farley Mowat visited many such sites, compiling fieldwork notes largely from local reports, and his 1998 The Farfarers: Before The Norse aka The Alban Quest: The Search For A Lost Tribe, has original outline maps sketching in a large number of these possible sites. Copyright restrictions discourage me from reproducing them here, but the book is still available online, detailing Mowat’s arguments. For example, he felt that the roofless ruins found around these coasts are a reflection of an old Scots-Irish practice where you use your longboat as the roof of your shelter on such distant shores where no suitable trees etc are to be found locally; thus he argues L’Anse aux Meadows may be a Keltic site rather than a Norse one.


Thursday, May 29, 2008

Stonehenge – Temple Of The Sun-God?

A new theory about Stonehenge may throw light on a key episode of early British history.
Solving Stonehenge coverEarlier, I suggested the identification of Stonehenge as the centre of the “Hyperborean” or farthest-North island domain in early Greek accounts may be of interest here. [For details, see “Pytheas And The Lost City Of Apollo.] That is, it might throw some light on the great unresolved mystery of early British history. How did Christianity become established here, before it did in Rome?
The first issue here is what religion did the British have, which Christianity overtook? Until recently, Stonehenge has not been considered evidence here as archaeological dating puts its abandonment over a thousand years earlier - no later than 1200 BC. Last year it was argued the early Greek travel account of a massive temple complex dedicated to Hyperborean Apollo and ruled by a priestly caste refers to Stonehenge and Vespasian’s Camp hillfort by Amesbury (the nearest town to Stonehenge). The argument modern antiquarian Dennis Price came up with last year was that these references derive from the lost codex of Pytheas detailing his visit here, c.330BC. Excavation of the Vespasian’s Camp rubbish pits show human occupation till 350 BC, which is at least around the time Pytheas visited Britain – though we don’t know exactly where he went. Now, if local religious practices did not change for 4-5 centuries - from then until Christianity arrived in the early Roman Era - then we have a possible continuity of religious belief. Thus, our second question may be answered: before Christianity, the official religion was worship of Apollo, the sun-god, god of healing and learning (and other things).
The problem is there’s still quite a jump in time here, with Stone Age, Bronze Age, and Iron Age evidence being run together to present a continuity that may be an illusion. Most people if asked would say the pre-Roman society of Britain was the Kelts, though the Celtic tribes seem to have been largely refugees from the Roman conquest of Gaul by Caesar around 55 BC. And for a long time there’s been such a gulf in the world-views of the academics and the New Agers over Stonehenge itself there’s been no genuine debate to and fro which might help resolve the mystery. But I’m told this was largely due to the English Heritage site’s now-dead chief archaeologist. He proclaimed Stonehenge was a mystery that would never be solved – so there was no point digging anything up. (There’s a conspiracy theory about this, that he made some sort of discovery early on, which so upset him he closed the site to further exploration.)
Now he’s gone, the next generation, including his own trainees, are developing new theories which are coming closer to the alternative view. The much publicised BBC/Smithsonian Museum-sponsored dig in April, the first inside the ring at Stonehenge for over 40 years (!), by Tim Darvill and Geoffrey Wainwright, was only days old when they announced they had found evidence to back up their thesis the site was “a prehistoric Lourdes” or healing spa, to which the unwell (but well-off) travelled from across Europe. This is perhaps not surprising, as the two had already co-authored a book documenting this interpretation.
Their thesis is at variance with the traditional notion it was a monument to the ancestral dead, the centre of a necropolis, with thousands of burials in the surrounding plain. (Perhaps the “cure” there – by one account using water poured over the “healing” stones - was usually a failure.) The “necropolis-monument” theory had already been challenged by the ‘astro-archaeological’ argument, popularised in the 1960s by Gerald S. Hawkins in popular paperbacks like Stonehenge Decoded that it was a prehistoric astronomical observatory and “computer.” He diagrammed how the posts and stones were aligned to the rising and setting of the sun, moon and certain constellations at key times. Critics pointed out the alignments involved stones that had stood, and often been moved, at different times, up to and including the 20th-century.
Now we have yet another computer-based ancient-code theory, which specifically attacks the ‘astronomical-computer’ argument, saying apart from an overall alignment of the central avenue to the solstices, the stones are not aligned to anything - except each other. The new book, Solving Stonehenge: The Key To An Ancient Enigma (Thames & Hudson, $40) by Anthony Johnson, “an archaeologist specializing in geophysics, survey and computer applications in archaeology,” advances the theory instead that Stonehenge is a reflection of ‘Pythagorean’ geometry. This is of interest here as the Pythagoreans were linked with the Hyperboreans (remember them?). Indeed, one of the Pythagorean Brotherhood, a priest called Abaris, is said to have visited the Hyperboreans. And Bladud, the legendary “Druid King” founder of the now-famous hot-spring mud spa farther west, the City of Bath in Somerset, supposedly visited Pythagoras, the 6th-C. BC Greek "father of numbers". This is not so strange as it might first sound, since both the Greeks and the Hyperboreans shared a worship of Apollo. The Hyperboreans used to send maidens to Greece every year bearing gifts for Apollo. And Apollo himself was said to leave Greece every 19th year to spend three months among the Hyperboreans, because his mother Leto came from there. The early Greek description we mentioned at the outset refers to this. (Found in the Diodorus’s 1st C. BC World History, it is usually attributed not to Pytheas but an earlier lost codex, Hecataeus’s 6th-C BC History Of The Hyperboreans). It mentions “a magnificent sacred precinct of Apollo and a notable temple …. built after the pattern of the spheres.” This last phrase it what gets Stonehenge researchers excited, taken as support for the astro-archaeology theory.
Anthony Johnson’s new book claims to show how (with mathematical proofs) Stonehenge was purely an exercise in Pythagorean geometry. He says this knowledge was part of “the Neolithic belief system”. This would explain how ‘Pythagorean’ geometry existed over two thousand years before Pythagoras. Johnson disputes in effect that “the pattern of the spheres” should be taken as an astronomical reference. What it could also refer to is the ancient ‘Pythagorean’ model of the cosmos as a set of 7 nested spheres, for Stonehenge is a set of 7 nested rings. And Johnson’s claim 56 was the key number is quite compatible with the reference to the celebration in every 19th year. For this is the way the Great or Metonic cycle of 18.61 years was calculated (as 19+18+19 =56), when the sun and moon returned to the same positions in the sky at the same seasonal point.
As to our original question - how did Christianity become established here so early … there is an obscure codex reference to the arrival in Britain of the first disciples from Palestine at the time the local priests were away attending to the manifestation of their god - which occurred every 19 years. But this will have to wait until next time.

Some ancients believed the cosmos was a set of nested sphere. Here, a scientist manages to break through.

Friday, September 14, 2007

Pytheas And The Lost City Of Apollo

As I’ve mentioned before, one of the circumstantial arguments in favour of Christianity possibly arriving in England as early as the 1st Century is the ‘tin-trade’ route. Without getting into the legend of Joseph of Arimatheia being a tin-trader and the morass that is England’s ‘Holy Legend’ here, we’ll just say the route was a historically attested direct link between the southwest coast of England and Palestine in antiquity. This route is associated with the Bronze Age (British tin was needed to make quality bronze). However the only historical accounts are much later, from the Classical period – Iron Age rather than Bronze, indicating it was still in use when Caesar arrived. These descriptions are attributed to early Greek travellers, in particular Pytheas who - some modern writers speculate - travelled to Britain using the established tin-trade route of the time. His account of his voyage of circa 330 BC up to (and around) Britain is lost, but references to it (sometimes sceptical) survive in the work of over a dozen classical-era Greek and Roman writers. There are other early descriptions of Britain which are not credited by these classical writers overtly to Pytheas, but may still derive from his long-lost codex.
Stonehenge todayOne such reference is the account of a ‘spherical’ or round [sphairoeides] temple and precinct ‘sacred to Apollo’ in the land of the Hyperboreans, which survives in the World History of Diodorus Siculus of circa 50 BC. This is often mentioned in books about Stonehenge (e.g. by Gerald Hawkins), the assumption being this must be our earliest description of the site, and is usually thought to derive from an even older lost codex, the 5th-C BC History Of The Hyperboreans by Hecataeus of Abdera. Now an archaeologist has claimed the famous description of a ‘spherical temple and precinct sacred to Apollo’ derives from Pytheas’s 4th C. BC visit. This is slightly startling as there is no consensus about where Pytheas landed on the south coast, though the Avon Valley leading to Stonehenge and other ancient sites seems to have been a major trade route inland. He also argues that the reference is not to a single site but to two distinct sites, with Stonehenge as the ‘temple’ and the sacred precinct another, heretofore neglected, site a mile east, towards Salisbury. This site has evidently been ignored partly as it was misleadingly named 'Vespasian's Camp' by the 16C antiquarian William Camden, no earlier name being known. Camden simply surmised the site must have been a Roman camp from the time of Vespasian’s invasion up the Avon Valley in AD 70. Since then, traces of much earlier use have been found - from the Neolithic (pits) and the early Bronze Age (barrow-style funeral mounds), the chalk spur whose lower slope the ‘camp’ sits on being named Kings Barrow Ridge.
The name or epithet Chorea Giganticum, given in Latin in a 12th-century prose epic of the founding of Britain, is sometimes invoked as a possible ancient name for Stonehenge (which is of course a Saxon name), the Latin being translated Giants’ Circle or Giants’ Dance. This apparent old name appears in two later manuscripts as “Choir Gaur” which is taken to mean the same, Celtic Gawr meaning giant or mighty. It also refers to music: we still use the words choir, chorus, and choreographer for a group of singers or dancers and the dance director. And those who studied such prehistoric circles were also known in the 18th century as Chorographers. As ancient music and dance were often part of sacred rites, the word chorea as a place has implications of a ritual centre. “Coria” meaning a hosting place survives in Gaelic, the older Q-Celtic branch from Ireland. Its root may be the Q-Celtic counterpart of P-Celtic ‘Bor-’, which survives in the Latin name Aurora Borealis, the Northern Lights. The terms Boreas, Boreades, and Hyperborea which occur in the ancient account refer to the North Wind, the Northernmost land beyond it, with Boreades the name of the sacred precinct’s supervisors, the priests of Hyperborean Apollo mentioned by Diodorus.
The archaeologist in question, Dennis Price, who also got press coverage last year when he found Stonehenge's lost ‘altar’ stone, has been poring over these ancient accounts with language experts from Exeter University. He argues the reference to a round temple and precinct sacred to Apollo has been misunderstood. He argues it must refer to two different sites, with the former being Stonehenge and the latter being not Stonehenge’s wooden ‘sister’ sites of Woodhenge or Durrington Walls, but the larger yet heretofore neglected site called Vespasian's Camp [OS Map ref SU1441 - click this link and type the OS ‘code’ cited into the search box to see a closeup map section].
An 1812 sketch of 'Vespasian's Camp' by Sir Richard Colt-HoareThe ancient account describes the sacred precinct as a ‘city’ [Greek polis]. Vespasian’s biography tells how he stormed some 30 oppida i.e. hill forts which are tribal centres or capitals, from Wight north, and this may be the type of site meant. The site in question has previously been classed as a large Iron Age hillfort: it was 15 hectares across, sitting inside a 40m wide bank ringed by a 5-10m deep ditch. (Some ‘henge’ i.e. bank-and-ditch sites are regarded by archaeologists today not as military sites in the Roman ‘vallum’ style, but where the ditch is inside the bank – impractical for defence - as sacred enclosures, as at Stonehenge.) A 1995 English Heritage archaeological report mentions a layer of domestic rubbish 1m thick, suggesting a once-substantial population. (The main occupation dates are put at 1100-800 BC and 700–350 BC, which don’t really accord with Stonehenge dates.)
Its entrance is not far from ‘The Avenue’ ancient processional way from Stonehenge to the Avon at Amesbury. (Today, the road leading out of Amesbury to Stonehenge crosses the site, with houses on the south side, by the Avon.) Price surmises the earthworks are on such a scale they may have prompted Pytheas to think of Troy, whose divine protector was the sun-god Apollo. A recent book (I was invited to its local ‘launch’ event just before Xmas), Stonehenge: The Biography Of A Landscape, by archeo-historian Prof. Tim Darvill of Bournemouth University, theorises Stonehenge was a sort of prehistoric Lourdes, with Apollo (that most versatile of ancient deities) in this context a healing presence.
All this has been getting press coverage in print and online, but another possible link not featured so far is the Perpetual Choir. The ancient account says that hymns were sung to Hyperborean Apollo non-stop by a large group of dedicated singers (our ‘chorea’ or ‘choir gawr’ again?), and there are allusions to such choirs in Celtic lore. The Troiedd Ynys Prydein (Triads Of The Island Britain), which exist in a handful of discrepant manuscripts, are thought to have been used by bards or druids as ‘mnemonics’, to memorise key cultural and historical events as refrains about which whole narratives once existed.
One triad concerns The ‘3 Perpetual Choirs of Britain’, and some versions of the TYP manuscript give one of the 3 choir-venues as a nearby one - either Salisbury (as Caer-Salog), or else Amesbury. Amesbury, the town closest to Stonehenge, is where stood a famous Priory and convent (in the English version of the Arthurian Romances, the adulterous Guinevere ends up there). Amesbury Abbey was built just below the site of Vespasian's Camp hillfort, and it became part of the now-vanished Abbey’s grounds. Later, the land became part of the Marquess of Queensberry's estate, and in the 18th century the hillfort area was landscaped in the fashion of the day with planted shrubbery, ‘ornamental’ walks, and a grotto including a "Merlin's Cave." Antiquarians have tried to link the place-name Amesbury with the late Romano-British general Ambrosius Aurelianus who helped keep the invading Saxons at bay, as well as with the word ‘Ambrosian’ as it is used to mean heavenly music – as in the Ambrosian Singers, the famous London choral group formed in 1951.
There are obviously more developments to come on this, hopefully touching on the route early travellers like Pytheas took to Britain. Look out for an upcoming BBC-TV episode of Timewatch on new theories about the Stonehenge area.